ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Differences in ischemic heart disease between males and females using predictive artificial intelligence models
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Jordan, Amman, JORDAN
2
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Irbid National University, Irbid, JORDAN
Publication date: 2024-09-19
Electron J Gen Med 2024;21(5):em607
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Cardiovascular health and preventative strategies are influenced by the sex of the individuals. To forecast cardiac events or detect ischemic heart disease (IHD) early, machine-learning algorithms can analyze complex patient data patterns. Early detection allows for lifestyle changes, medication management, or invasive treatments to slow disease progression and improve outcomes.
Aim:
To compare and predict the differences in the primary sources of IHD burden between males and females in various age groups, geographical regions, death versus alive, and comorbidity levels.
Methods:
A predictive and retrospective design was implemented in this study. Electronic health records were extracted, which were equally distributed among males and females with IHD. The dataset consisted of patients who were admitted between 2015 and 2022. Two of the eight models generated by Modeler software were implemented in this study: the Bayesian network model, which achieved the highest area under curve score (0.600), and the Chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) model, which achieved the highest overall accuracy score (57.199%).
Results:
The study sample included 17,878 men and women, 58% of whom had no comorbidities and 1.7% who died. Age, the Charlson comorbidity index score, and geographical location all predicted IHD, but age was more influential. Bayesian network analysis showed that IHD odds were highest in males 40-59 and females 60-79, with the highest mortality risk in females 80-100. North and south Jordan had higher IHD rates and middle-aged males from north and middle governorates had higher IHD rates according to CHAID.
Conclusion:
By using artificial intelligence, clinicians can improve patient outcomes, treatment quality, and save lives in the fight against cardiovascular illnesses. To predict IHD early, machine-learning algorithms can analyze complex patient data patterns to improve outcomes.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Mensah GA, Fuster V, Murray CJ, Roth GA, Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks Collaborators. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks, 1990-2022. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(25):2350-473.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc... PMid:38092509 PMCid:PMC7615984.
2.
WHO. Coronavirus dashboard. World Health Organization; 2023. Available at:
https://covid19.who.int/ (Accessed: 12 July 2024).
3.
Darvish S, Mahoney SA, Venkatasubramanian R, Rossman MJ, Clayton ZS, Murray KO. Socioeconomic status as a potential mediator of arterial aging in marginalized ethnic and racial groups: Current understandings and future directions. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024;137(1):194-222.
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplp... PMid:38813611.
4.
Bardo AR, Cummings JL. Life, longevity, and the pursuit of happiness: The role of disability in shaping racial and sex disparities in living a long and happy life. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42:72.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113....
5.
Okpokwasili OA. Redefining gender through language. Nnadiebube J Lang Liter. 2023;1(1):44-57.
7.
Aggarwal NR, Patel HN, Mehta LS, et al. Sex differences in ischemic heart disease: Advances, obstacles, and next steps. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(2):e004437.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOU... PMid:29449443.
8.
Bani Hani S, Ahmad M. Effective prediction of mortality by heart disease among women in Jordan using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection model: Retrospective validation study. JMIR Cardio. 2023;7: e48795.
https://doi.org/10.2196/48795 PMid:37471126 PMCid:PMC10401188.
9.
Elia E, Bruono F, Crimi G, et al. Gender differences in the development of heart failure after acute coronary syndrome: Insight from the CORALYS registry. Int J Cardiol. 2024;397:131622.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijca... PMid:38061607.
10.
Lunova T, Komorovsky R, Klishch I. Gender differences in treatment delays, management and mortality among patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(1):e300622206530.
https://doi.org/10.2174/157340... PMid:35786190 PMCid:PMC10201882.
11.
Kundu J, James KS, Hossain B, Chakraborty R. Gender differences in premature mortality for cardiovascular disease in India, 2017-18. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:547.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889... PMid:36949397 PMCid:PMC10035272.
12.
Gonuguntla K, Badu I, Duhan S, et al. Sex and racial disparities in proportionate mortality of premature myocardial infarction in the United states 1999 to 2020. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(12):e033515.
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.1... PMid:38842272 PMCid:PMC11255752.
13.
Carberry J, Aubiniere-Robb L, Kamdar A, Lomholt-Welch H, Berry C. Reappraising ischemic heart disease in women. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023;24(4):118.
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm... PMid:39076281 PMCid:PMC11273011.
14.
Vela AM, Carroll AJ. Cardiac psychology: Psychosocial and behavioral assessment and treatment for cardiovascular conditions. J Health Serv Psychol. 2023;49:21-32.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42843....
15.
Park JY, Kim MH, Bae EJ, et al. Comorbidities can predict mortality of kidney transplant recipients: Comparison with the Charlson comorbidity index. Transplant Proc. 2018;50(4):1068-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tran... PMid:29731067.
16.
Zhang N, Lin Q, Jiang H, Zhu H. Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index as effective predictor for in-hospital mortality of patients with cardiac arrest: A retrospective study. BMC Emerg Med. 2023;23(1):7.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873... PMid:36703122 PMCid:PMC9878885.
17.
Cai M, Liu E, Zhang R, et al. Comparing the performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices to predict in-hospital mortality among a Chinese population. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:307-16.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S... PMid:32256119 PMCid:PMC7090198.
18.
Bani Hani SH, Ahmad MM. Machine-learning algorithms for ischemic heart disease prediction: A systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(1):e090622205797.
https://doi.org/10.2174/157340... PMid:35692135 PMCid:PMC10201879.
19.
Ahmad M, Bani Hani S, Abu-Abeeleh M, Aljarah I. Prediction of mortality in young adults with cardiovascular disease using artificial intelligence. Electron J Gen Med. 2024;21(3):em584.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/....
20.
Khan S, Nazir MB, Hussain I. Revolutionizing cardiac care: AI and deep learning in heart health. Int J Adv Eng Technol Innov. 2024;1(4):189-208.
21.
Khdair H, Dasari NM. Exploring machine learning techniques for coronary heart disease prediction. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2021;12(5):28-36.
https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACS....
22.
GBD 2021 Forecasting Collaborators. Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022-2050: A forecasting analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2204-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-... PMid:38762325.
23.
Ahmad M, Sabih M, Fawaz M, et al. Awareness, benefits, threats, attitudes, and satisfaction with AI tools among Asian and African higher education staff and students. J Appl Learn Teach. 2024;7(1):57-64.
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.....
24.
Tailakh S, Ahmad MM. Evaluation of patient discharge information between what is said and what is written. Asia Pac J Health Manag. 2023;18(3):170-9.
https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm....
26.
McCormick K, Salcedo J. IBM SPSS Modeler essentials: Effective techniques for building powerful data mining and predictive analytics solutions. Birmingham (UK): Packt Publishing Ltd, 2017.
27.
Ramotra AK, Mahajan A, Kumar R, Mansotra V. Comparative analysis of data mining classification techniques for prediction of heart disease using the Weka and SPSS modeler tools. In: Zhang YD, Mandal J, So-In C, Thakur N, editors. Smart trends in computing and communications. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 165. New York City, NY: Springer; 2020, p. 89-97.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
28.
Carrington AM, Manuel DG, Fieguth PW, et al. Deep ROC analysis and AUC as balanced average accuracy, for improved classifier selection, audit and explanation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023;45(1):329-41.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.... PMid:35077357.
29.
Feng D, Zhou J, Jing L, Jiang S, Wu T, Jiang X. Adaptability evaluation of conceptual design for smart product-service system: An integrated rough DEMATEL and Bayesian network model. J Clean Prod. 2023;417:137999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
30.
Ananth CV, Rutherford C, Rosenfeld EB, et al. Epidemiologic trends and risk factors associated with the decline in mortality from coronary heart disease in the United States, 1990-2019. Am Heart J. 2023;263:46-55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.... PMid:37178994.
31.
Ryczkowska K, Adach W, Janikowski K, Banach M, Bielecka-Dabrowa A. Menopause and women’s cardiovascular health: Is it really an obvious relationship? Arch Med Sci. 2023;19(2):458-66.
https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/1... PMid:37034510 PMCid:PMC10074318.
32.
GBD 2021 Demographics Collaborators. Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950-2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive demographic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):1989-2056.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-... PMid:38484753.
33.
Al Khoufi EA. Age-related variations in cardiovascular disease outcomes: An analytical study in a clinical setting. Pak Heart J. 2022;55(3):309-21.
34.
Wolf S, Schievano E, Amidei CB, et al. Mortality trend of ischemic heart disease (2008-2022): A retrospective analysis of epidemiological data. Int J Cardiol. 2024; 406:132042.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijca... PMid:38614362.
35.
Bani Hani S, Ahmad M. Predicting mortality amongst Jordanian men with heart attacks using the chi-square automatic interaction detection model. Health Informatics J. 2024;30(3):14604582241270830.
https://doi.org/10.1177/146045... PMid:39115806.
36.
Smaardijk VR, Lodder P, Kop WJ, van Gennep B, Maas AH, Mommersteeg PM. Sex- and gender-stratified risks of psychological factors for incident ischemic heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(9):e010859.
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.1... PMid:31030598 PMCid:PMC6512085.
37.
Nguyen AH, Hurwitz M, Sullivan SA, Saad A, Kennedy JLW, Sharma G. Update on sex specific risk factors in cardiovascular disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1352675.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2... PMid:38380176 PMCid:PMC10876862.
38.
Nazli SA, Rosman A, Kasim NAM, et al. Coronary risk factor profiles according to different age categories in premature coronary artery disease patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Sci Rep. 2024; 14:15326.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:38961082 PMCid:PMC11222582.
39.
Conrad N, Molenberghs G, Verbeke G, et al. Trends in cardiovascular disease incidence among 22 million people in the UK over 20 years: Population based study. BMJ. 2024; 385:e078523.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-20... PMid:38925788 PMCid:PMC11203392.
40.
Sowers K. Cardiovascular health disparities in us Youngwomen: Examining the influence of race, healthcare accessibility, socioeconomic status, and geography [thesis]. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2024.
41.
GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440): 2100-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-... PMid:38582094.
42.
Mohammad EB, Ahmad M. A systematic evaluation of big data-driven colorectal cancer studies. Med Glas (Zenica). 2024;21(1):63-77.
https://doi.org/10.17392/1684-... PMid:38341673.