Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About us
Aims and Scope
Indexing and Abstracting
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Fast-Track Paper Publication Option
Conflict Interest Guidance
Submit an Article
Special Issues
News & Editorials
“Fake,” “Predatory,” and “Pseudo” Journals: Charlatans Threatening Trust in Science
Shifting the Journal submission-review system to the Editorial System Manuscript December 27, 2017.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Factors affecting PACES success rate–A Singapore experience
1
Division of General Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Sengkang, SINGAPORE
2
Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Johor, MALAYSIA
3
Division of General Medicine, Woodlands Health Campus, SINGAPORE
4
Division of Advanced Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, SINGAPORE
Publication date: 2022-06-25
Electron J Gen Med 2022;19(5):em388
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
MRCP (UK) is intentionally renowned for its relevance as a summative assessment in internal medicine training. It is known that the passing rates for the clinical component of MRCP (PACES) examinations for non-UK trainees are lower. Studies involving UK candidates proposed that factors such as availability and quality of postgraduate medical education, candidate demographics, and candidate’s preparation efforts for this examination may affect the prospect of success. However, these factors have not been studied in detail among non-UK candidates.
Material and Methods:
To study these factors in non-UK candidates, we conducted an online survey of all doctors who took PACES examination from year 2009 to 2017 in a Singapore tertiary hospital to determine if these factors are similar in our population. A total of 107 respondents completed the survey. Pearson Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to determine the significance of these factors and their relationship with PACES examination success.
Results:
Singapore medical graduates perform better than their counterparts who are from medical schools outside Singapore. Males performed equally well as their female counterparts in PACES.
Conclusion:
It is suggested to look beyond conventional factors for other non-demographic contributors such as training, preparedness, and how organized is the candidate.
MRCP (UK) is intentionally renowned for its relevance as a summative assessment in internal medicine training. It is known that the passing rates for the clinical component of MRCP (PACES) examinations for non-UK trainees are lower. Studies involving UK candidates proposed that factors such as availability and quality of postgraduate medical education, candidate demographics, and candidate’s preparation efforts for this examination may affect the prospect of success. However, these factors have not been studied in detail among non-UK candidates.
Material and Methods:
To study these factors in non-UK candidates, we conducted an online survey of all doctors who took PACES examination from year 2009 to 2017 in a Singapore tertiary hospital to determine if these factors are similar in our population. A total of 107 respondents completed the survey. Pearson Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to determine the significance of these factors and their relationship with PACES examination success.
Results:
Singapore medical graduates perform better than their counterparts who are from medical schools outside Singapore. Males performed equally well as their female counterparts in PACES.
Conclusion:
It is suggested to look beyond conventional factors for other non-demographic contributors such as training, preparedness, and how organized is the candidate.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Membership of the Royal College of Physicians of the United Kingdom. MRCP (UK) examinations. London: MRCP (UK), 2020. Available from: https://www.mrcpuk.org/mrcpuk-....
2.
McAlpine L, Selamaj E, Shannon C, Chis L, Dacre J, Elder A. UK postgraduate medicine examinations: Opportunities for international candidates. Clin Med (Lond). 2014;14(5):500-5. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinme... PMid:25301910 PMCid:PMC4951958.
3.
Wakeford R, Denney M, Ludka-Stempien K, Dacre J, McManus IC. Cross-comparison of MRCGP & MRCP (UK) in a database linkage study of 2,284 candidates taking both examinations: Assessment of validity and differential performance by ethnicity. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909... PMid:25592199 PMCid:PMC4302509.
4.
Wakeford R, Ludka K, Woolf K, McManus IC. Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP (UK) assessments: Data linkage study. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916... PMid:30522486 PMCid:PMC6284295.
5.
Huggan PJ, Samarasekara DD, Archuleta S, et al. The successful, rapid transition to a new model of graduate medical education in Singapore. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1268-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b... PMid:2283684.
6.
Ministry of Health Singapore. Internal medicine examination. Available at: https://www.healthprofessional... (Accessed: 18 March 2022).
7.
Unwin E, Potts HWW, Dacre J, Elder A, Woolf K. Passing MRCP (UK) PACES: A cross-sectional study examining the performance of doctors by sex and country. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909... PMid:29625566 PMCid:PMC5889582.
8.
Tighe J, McManus IC, Dewhurst NG, Chis L, Mucklow J. The standard error of measurement is a more appropriate measure of quality for postgraduate medical assessments than is reliability: An analysis of MRCP (UK) examinations. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6... PMid:20525220 PMCid:PMC2893515.
9.
Membership of the Royal College of Physicians of the United Kingdom. Exam pass rate. MRCPUK, 2020. Available at: https://www.mrcpuk.org/mrcpuk-... (Accessed: 18 March 2022).
10.
Membership of the Royal College of Physicians of the United Kingdom. PACES. London: MRCPUK, 2020. Available at: https://www.mrcpuk.org/mrcpuk-... (Accessed: 18 March 2022).
11.
McManus IC, Thompson M, Mollon J. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency (‘hawk-dove effect’) in the MRCP (UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ. 2006; 6:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6... PMid:16919156 PMCid:PMC1569374.
12.
Bessant R, Bessant D, Chesser A, Coakley G. Analysis of predictors of success in the MRCP (UK) PACES examination in candidates attending a revision course. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(964):145-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.20... PMid:16461479 PMCid:PMC2596701.
13.
McManus IC, Elder AT, de Champlain A, Dacre JE, Mollon J, Chis L. Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) part 1, part 2 and PACES examinations. BMC Med. 2008;6:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7... PMid:18275598 PMCid:PMC2265293.
14.
Pinheiro-Torres C, Tang P, Dacre J. Performance at MRCP (UK): when should trainees sit examinations? Clin Med (Lond). 2013;13(2):166-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7... PMid:18275598 PMCid:PMC2265293.
15.
McManus IC, Wakeford R. PLAB and UK graduates’ performance on MRCP (UK) and MRCGP examinations: Data linkage study. BMJ. 2014;348:g2621. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2... PMid:24742473 PMCid:PMC3990836.
16.
Dewhurst NG, McManus C, Mollon J, Dacre JE, Vale AJ. Performance in the MRCP (UK) examination 2003-4: Analysis of pass rates of UK graduates in relation to self-declared ethnicity and gender. BMC Med. 2007;5:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7... PMid:17477862 PMCid:PMC1871601.
17.
Woolf K, Potts HWW, McManus IC. Ethnicity and academic performance in UK trained doctors and medical students: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d9... PMid:21385802 PMCid:PMC3050989.
18.
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). PISA 2018 results. OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publ... (Accessed: 26 April 2022).
19.
The Strait Times. More women studying medicine after lifting of quota. Available at: https://www.straitstimes.com/s... (Accessed: 18 March 2022).
20.
Stanley AG, Khan KM, Hussain W, Tweed M. Disorganized junior doctors fail the MRCP (UK). Med Teach. 2006;28(1):e40-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/014215... PMid:16627323.
21.
Henry ES, Quinton N. How to prepare for the Membership of the Royal College of Physicians (UK) part 2 clinical examination (practical assessment of clinical examination skills): An exploratory study. Edu Med J. 202;13(3):77-91. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2....
22.
Ong J, Swift C, Magill N, et al. The association between mentoring and training outcomes in junior doctors in medicine: An observational study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(9):e020721. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjope... PMid:30244205 PMCid:PMC6157572.
23.
Jerrom R, Roper T, Murthy N. Improving MRCP PACES pass rates through the introduction of a regional multifaceted support framework. BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6(2):e000017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-... PMid:28959777 PMCid:PMC5609347.
24.
Andrade HL. A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Front Educ. 2019;87.
25.
Elder A, McManus C, McAlpine L, Dacre J. What skills are tested in the new PACES examination? Ann Acad Med Singap. 2011;40(3):119-25. PMid:21603729.
| eISSN: | 2516-3507 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
