ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Prediction of mortality in young adults with cardiovascular disease using artificial intelligence
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Nursing, University of Jordan, Amman, JORDAN
 
2
Irbid National University, Irbid, JORDAN
 
3
School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JORDAN
 
4
Department of Information Technology, King Abdullah II School of Information Technology, Amman, JORDAN
 
 
Publication date: 2024-05-06
 
 
Electron J Gen Med 2024;21(3):em584
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Young mortality is prevalent among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). To develop prediction models for CVD mortality in young adults, it is crucial to assess CVD risks. Early detection of cardiac disorders using machine learning algorithms, a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) is crucial for preventing more damage to coronary arteries and saving lives.

Aims:
To predict mortality versus a life outcome among young adults (18-45 years) with CVD using AI technique known as Chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID) algorithms.

Methods:
A large-scale dataset was extracted from the electronic health records of 809 young adult patients diagnosed with CVD using a retrospective design. Information was retrieved regarding young adults from Jordan who were admitted to public health institutions between 2015 and the end of 2021.

Results:
CHAID algorithms were chosen among seven prediction models based on accuracy and area under curve to predict mortality vs life in young individuals (18-45 years old) with CVD. The mortality prediction algorithms started with pulse pressure, then diastolic blood pressure, then ischemic heart disease, and last geographical location.

Conclusions:
CHAID model used in our study indicated how the death rate was classified and distributed among a variety of parameters. As a result, we may argue that AI model could provide additional information on how many aspects are articulated in connection to CVD patient fatality situations.

REFERENCES (28)
1.
Rehman S, Rehman E, Ikram M, Jianglin Z. Cardiovascular disease (CVD): Assessment, prediction and policy implications. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1299. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889....
 
2.
Mensah GA, Fuster V, Murray CJL, Roth GA, Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks Collaborators. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks, 1990-2022. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(25):2350-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc... PMid:38092509.
 
3.
Königstein K, Wagner J, Frei M, et al. Endothelial function of healthy adults from 20 to 91 years of age: Prediction of cardiovascular risk by vasoactive range. J Hypertens. 2021;39(7):1361-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.00... PMid:33470736.
 
4.
WHO. Jordan. WHO; 2023. Available at: https://www.who.int/nmh/countr... (Accessed: 31 July 2023).
 
5.
Benjamin EJ, Munther P, Alonso A, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2019 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56-528.
 
6.
Vasan RS, Song RJ, Xanthakis V, et al. Hypertension-mediated organ damage: Prevalence, correlates, and prognosis in the community. Hypertension. 2022;79(3):505-15. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERT... PMid:35138872 PMCid:PMC8849561.
 
7.
McGavock JM, Anderson TJ, Lewanczuk RZ. Sedentary lifestyle and antecedents of cardiovascular disease in young adults. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19(7):701-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjh... PMid:16814124.
 
8.
Shetty DK, Rodrigues LLR, Shetty AK, Nair G. Machine learning based predictors of cardiovascular disease among young adults. Eng Sci. 2022;17:292-302. https://doi.org/10.30919/es8d6....
 
9.
Farzadfar F. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models: Challenges and perspectives. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(10):e1288-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-... PMid:31488388.
 
10.
Bani Hani S, Ahmad M. Effective prediction of mortality by heart disease among women in Jordan using the Chi-squared automatic interaction detection model: Retrospective validation study. JMIR Cardio. 2023;7:e48795. https://doi.org/10.2196/48795 PMid:37471126 PMCid:PMC10401188.
 
11.
Gamboa-Cruzado J, Crisostomo-Castro R, Vilabuleje J, López-Goycochea J, Valenzuela JN. Heart attack prediction using machine learning: A comprehensive systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2024;102(5).
 
12.
Gavhane A, Kokkula G, Pandya I, Devadkar K. Prediction of heart disease using machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology. IEEE; 2018. p. 1275-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA.....
 
13.
Bergamini M, Iora PH, Rocha TAH, et al. Mapping risk of ischemic heart disease using machine learning in a Brazilian state. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMid:33301451 PMCid:PMC7728276.
 
14.
Bani Hani S, Ahmad M. Machine-learning algorithms for ischemic heart disease prediction: A systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(1):e090622205797. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340... PMid:35692135 PMCid:PMC10201879.
 
15.
Gabriel PE. “Meaningful use” means process redesign. Chest. 2010;138(3):472-4. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.... PMid:20822984.
 
16.
IBM. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 25.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp, 2017.
 
17.
Kass GV. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of category data. Appl Stat. 1980;29:119-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/298629....
 
18.
Kass IS, Wang CC, Walrond JP, Stretton AO. Avermectin B1a, a paralyzing anthelmintic that affects interneurons and inhibitory motoneurons in Ascaris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77(10):6211-5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.7... PMid:6255481 PMCid:PMC350245.
 
19.
Wendler T, Gröttrup S. Data mining with SPSS modeler: Theory, exercises and solutions. New York City (NY): Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
20.
Tsamardinos I, Charonyktakis P, Papoutsoglou G, et al. Just add data: Automated predictive modeling for knowledge discovery and feature selection. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022;6(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698... PMid:35710826 PMCid:PMC9203777.
 
21.
Lee J-W, Shin S-J, Kim J, Kang H-T. Higher pulse pressure is associated with increased risk of cardio-cerebrovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A Korean national cohort study. Am J Hypertens. 2022;35(7):647-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hp... PMid:35363861.
 
22.
Tang Y, Liu S, Shi Y, et al. Association of blood pressure in the first-week of hospitalization and long-term mortality in patients with acute left ventricular myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2022;349:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijca... PMid:34838680.
 
23.
Khan SU, Bashir ZS, Khan MZ, et al. Trends in cardiovascular deaths among young adults in the United States, 1999 to 2018. Am J Cardiol. 2020;128:216-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjc... PMid:32534735 PMCid:PMC7457428.
 
24.
German CA, Baum SJ, Ferdinand KC, et al. Defining preventive cardiology: A clinical practice statement from the American Society for Preventive Cardiology. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2022;12:100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc... PMid:36425534 PMCid:PMC9679464.
 
25.
Naghavi M, Ong KL, Aali A, et al. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 2024 Apr 19:S0140-6736(24)00824-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-... PMID: 38582094.
 
26.
Jain V, Minhas AMK, Morris AA, et al. Demographic and regional trends of heart failure-related mortality in young adults in the US, 1999-2019. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(9):900-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaca... PMid:35895048 PMCid:PMC9330269.
 
27.
Montinari MR, Minelli P, Russo A, Gianicolo E. Patterns of coronary heart disease mortality in Italy from 1931 to 2015 and a focus on a region with highly industrialized areas. Int J Cardiol. 2022;354:56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijca... PMid:35278577.
 
28.
Schumacher, Kyu HH, Aali A, et al. Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950–2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024 Mar 8:S0140-6736(24)00476-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-... PMid: 38484753.
 
eISSN:2516-3507
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top