ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Media and their Informative Role in the Face of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Validation of Fear Perception and Magnitude of the Issue (MED-COVID-19)
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universidad Continental, Lima, PERU
 
2
Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, PERU
 
3
Asociación de Médica de Investigación y Servicios en Salud, Lima, PERU
 
4
Facultad de Medicina Humana “Manuel Huamán Guerrero”, Universidad Ricardo Palma. Lima, PERU
 
5
Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán, Huánuco, PERU
 
6
Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo, PERU
 
7
Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga, Ica, PERU
 
8
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, PERU
 
9
Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, PERU
 
10
Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, BRAZIL
 
11
Modestum Ltd, UK
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-04-16
 
 
Publication date: 2020-04-16
 
 
Electron J Gen Med 2020;17(6):em239
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The media play an important role in the dissemination of information on the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. However, it is important to measure whether the population is receiving information that calms it down, as well as whether such news are in accordance with the magnitude of the issue.

Objective:
To validate a questionnaire that measures the perception of the media and their informative role in the face of COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:
A validation process for a questionnaire that measures the perception of the magnitude of this issue and whether it generates fear was carried out. The validation was performed by means of a literature search. Moreover, a first version of the scale was developed, which was assessed by 30 experts (physicians, epidemiologists, among others). After this, an exploratory factor analysis and descriptive statistics were performed.

Results:
Our scale had 13 initial items; however, one of them was eliminated because of its unsatisfactory level of statistical adequacy. Exploratory factorial analysis and parallel analysis suggested three factors. Results of the KMO coefficient (0.833) and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity (4998.5; gl = 66; p<0.001) were acceptable and significant, which justify the exploratory factorial analysis. The correlation between the factors was >0.4 and robust analyses revealed a satisfactory factorial structure (X2=88.0; p= 0.001; IFC=0.968; GFI=0.992; TLI=0.937; RMSEA=0.123). In the descriptive statistics of the 12 final items, moderate and significant correlations between the items were reported (> 0.5).

Conclusion:
We generate a scale to validate the perception of how people receive information from the media. Thus, this scale can be used to measure the informative role of the media regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and may even serve for other similar public health emergencies.

REFERENCES (30)
1.
Ryu S, Chun BC, Korean Society of Epidemiology 2019-nCoV Task Force Team. An interim review of the epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus. Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020006. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e... PMid:32023775 PMCid:PMC7011107.
 
2.
Santacroce L, Charitos IA, Del Prete R. COVID-19 in Italy: an overview from the first case to date. Electron J Gen Med. 2020;17(6):em235. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/....
 
3.
Ait Addi R, Benksim A, Amine M, Cherkaoui M. COVID-19 outbreak and perspective in Morocco. Electron J Gen Med. 2020;17(4):em204. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/....
 
4.
Díez Guijarro JR. Coronavirus, ¿un nuevo obstáculo para la economía mundial? [online]. Madrid: Executive Excellence; 2020 March. Available at: http://www.eexcellence.es/inde... (Accessed 11 April 2020).
 
5.
Coronavirus e histeria: padres saltaron el muro de una escuela para sacar a sus hijos [online]. Buenos Aires: La Nación; 2020 March 13. Available at: https://www.lanacion.com.ar/el... (Accessed 11 April 2020).
 
6.
Castro C. Epidemia de histeria por el coronavirus: por qué nos volvemos locos y cómo vencer el miedo [online]. El Independiente; 2020 March 11. Available at: https://www.elindependiente.co... (Accessed 11 April 2020).
 
7.
Villegas-Chiroque M. Pandemia de COVID-19: pelea o huye. Rev Exp Med Hosp Reg Lamb. 2020;6(1). https://doi.org/10.37065/rem.v....
 
8.
Valerio L, Roure S, Martín-Cano L. Signos de alarma al regresar de un viaje. FMC. 2020;27(1):28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmc.... PMCid:PMC7144512.
 
9.
McFadden SM, Malik AA, Aguolu OG, Willebrand KS, Omer SB. Perceptions of the adult US population regarding the novel coronavirus outbreak. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.0....
 
10.
Kelvin DJ, Rubino S. Fear of the novel coronavirus. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020;14(1):1-2. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.1... PMid:32088678.
 
11.
Khan N, Naushad M. Effects of corona virus on the world community [online]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2020 February 04. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3....
 
12.
Serra Valdes MA. Infección respiratoria aguda por 2019-nCoV: una amenaza evidente. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2020;19(1):1-5.
 
13.
Khan S, Ali A, Siddique R, Nabi G. Novel coronavirus is putting the whole world on alert. J Hosp Infect. 2020;104(3):252-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin... PMid:32032614 PMCid:PMC7134434.
 
14.
Ren SY, Gao RD, Chen YL. Fear can be more harmful than the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in controlling the corona virus disease 2019 epidemic. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(4):652-7. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.... PMid:32149049 PMCid:PMC7052559.
 
15.
Bayle MS. Los medios, la epidemia y el miedo. El País [online]. Madrid: El País; 2020 March 11. Available at: https://elpais.com/elpais/2020... (Accessed 11 April 2020).
 
16.
Castañeda M. Así es la realidad periodística del coronavirus: peligroso y catastrófico [online]. Madrid: Merca2; 2020 March 4. Available at: https://www.merca2.es/realidad... (Accessed 11 April 2020).
 
17.
Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). COVID-19 situation in the region of the Americas; 2020. [online]. Available at: https://www.paho.org/en/topics... (Accessed 10 April 2020).
 
18.
Moreno-Montoya J. El desafío de comunicar y controlar la epidemia por coronavirus. Biomedica. 2020;40(1):11-3. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomed... PMid:32220158.
 
19.
Massuht Cruz HN. Comunicación en salud, un campo inexplorado por los medios. Diseño de la campaña comunicacional “Dale Crossfit” [research work] [online]. Guayaquil: Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil; 2016. Available at: http://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec... (Accessed 10 April 2020).
 
20.
Hernández AIH, Bascope AJL, Sánchez JAG. Nivel de ansiedad e información preoperatoria en pacientes programados para cirugía. Un estudio transversal descriptivo. Acta Médica Grupo Ángeles. 2016;14(1):6-11.
 
21.
Barba Salazar, DM. Revisión crítica: ¿mejora el nivel de conocimiento, la actitud del personal de salud del servicio de emergencia ante un sismo? [dissertation] [online]. Chiclayo: Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo; 2018. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.1... (Accessed 10 April 2020).
 
22.
Hidalgo Saltos MB. Nivel de ansiedad y miedo en pacientes de 12 a 20 años de edad al acudir a la atención odontológica: en cuatro centros de salud del Distrito 02d01 del cantón Guaranda, provincia Bolívar [research work] [online]. Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador; 2017. Available at: http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/h... (Accessed 10 April 2020).
 
23.
González-Fernández N, García AR, Gómez IA. Alfabetización mediática en escenarios familiares: Diagnóstico, necesidades y propuesta formativa. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS). 2019;(20):13. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20....
 
24.
Pérez VEV, Aguilera AE. Influencia social y familiar en el comportamiento del paciente con VIH/SIDA ante su diagnóstico y su manejo. Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2004;71(1):29-35.
 
25.
Lee TD, Park H, Lee J. Collaborative accountability for sustainable public health: a Korean perspective on the effective use of ICT-based health risk communication. Gov Inf Q. 2019;36(2):226-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.... PMCid:PMC7125608.
 
26.
Ortega PM, Ruiz-de Gordoa JJB, Róldan AM, Domínguez RB, Hernández MÁB. Análisis de impactos de los medios de comunicación de los casos de la fiebre hemorrágica de Crimea-Congo en la Comunidad de Madrid (2018). El papel de la comunicación institucional en crisis de salud pública. Revista de Comunicación y Salud. 2018;8(1):99-109. https://doi.org/10.35669/revis....
 
27.
Gesser-Edelsburg A. Risk communication and infectious diseases in an age of digital media. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;79(Suppl1):130-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid....
 
28.
Novillo-Ortiz D, Hernández-Pérez T, Saigí-Rubió F. Availability of information in Public Health on the Internet: an analysis of national health authorities in the Spanish-speaking Latin American and Caribbean countries. Int J Med Inform. 2017;100:46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme... PMid:28241937.
 
29.
Saxon B, Bass SB, Wright T, Panick J. Ebola and the rhetoric of US newspapers: assessing quality risk communication in public health emergencies. J Risk Res. 2019;22(10):1309-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698....
 
30.
Hugelius K, Adams M, Romo-Murphy E. The power of radio to promote health and resilience in natural disasters: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(14). pii: E2526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid: 31311142 PMCid:PMC6679034.
 
eISSN:2516-3507
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top