Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About us
Aims and Scope
Indexing and Abstracting
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Fast-Track Paper Publication Option
Conflict Interest Guidance
Submit an Article
Special Issues
News & Editorials
“Fake,” “Predatory,” and “Pseudo” Journals: Charlatans Threatening Trust in Science
Shifting the Journal submission-review system to the Editorial System Manuscript December 27, 2017.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Using an intraoperative computed tomography scanner with a navigation station for spinal surgery
1
Scientific – Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
2
National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery named after N.N. Burdenko, Моscow, Russia
3
National Center Children’s Rehabilitation Corporate Fund “University Medical Center”, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
4
JSC « Astana Medical University », Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
Online publication date: 2019-12-26
Publication date: 2019-12-26
Electron J Gen Med 2019;16(6):em182
KEYWORDS
intraoperative computed tomographyelectron-optical transducernavigation stationtranspedicular fixation
ABSTRACT
The authors conducted a retrospective and prospective analysis of the results of 350 operations using the EIC, 390 operations with O arm and 11 operations with O arm and the Stealth-Station navigation station (Medtronic, USA).
To the 350 patients operated on using the EIC, 1822 screws were implanted, on average 5.2 screws per operation. 117 (6.5%) screws were implanted incorrectly, of which a permissible or clinically insignificant malposition of the screw was noted in 90 (4.9%) patients. Incorrectly installed screws remaining in 27 (1.5%) patients required revision surgery.
To 390 patients operated with O arm, 2477 screws were implanted, on average 6.3 screws during one operation. Incorrectly 33 (1.3%) screws were implanted, of which 25 screws were acceptable malposition. Invalid malposition of 8 (0.3%) screws was eliminated during the current operation.
Comparing trials of the total number of incorrectly implanted screws during operations using the EIC and O arm showed that they were more often observed when using the EIC (p <0.001) and there was no unacceptable malposition of the screws when performing the operation under O arm, since it was diagnosed in time during current operation and eliminated.
A total of 66 screws were implanted in 11 patients operated using O arm and the Stealth-Station navigation station, an average of 6 screws during one operation. Inaccurate implantation of screws was not observed in any patient.
O-arm with the Stealth-Station navigation station is the most modern method of controlling the correctness of spinal operations when anatomical landmarks are partially invisible - with open operations or invisible at all - with minimally invasive surgical interventions in real time.
REFERENCES (32)
2.
Nussbaum DA, Gailloud P, Murphy K. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 2004;15(11):1185-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI... PMid:15525736.
3.
Fujita T, Kostuik JP, Huckel CB, et al. Complication of spinal fusion in adult patients more then 60 yeas of age. Orthopedic Clinics of Noth America, 1998;29(4):669-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-....
4.
Jendrisak MD. Spontaneous abdominal aortic rupture from erosion by a lumbar spine fixation devise : a case report. Surgery, 1986;99(5):631-3.
5.
Stewart JR, Barth KH, Williams GM. Ruptured lumbar artery pseudoaneyrysm: n unusual cause of retroperitoneal haemorrhage. Surgery, 1983;94:592-4.
6.
Diaz H, Lockhart CH. Postoperative quadriplegia after spinal fusion for scoliosis with intraoperative awakening. Anest. Analg., 1987;66(10):1039-42. https://doi.org/10.1213/000005....
7.
Heyde CE, B Ahrm H, B Sagir H, Kaezer R. Erste Erfahrungen mit dem intraoperativen Wurzelmonitoring durch das INS-1-System an der lumbosakralen Wirbels-nule. Z Orthop. Ihre Grenzgeb., 2003;141(01):79-85. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003... PMid:12605335.
8.
Deen HG, Birch BD, Wharen RE, Reimer R. Lateral mass screw corod fixation of the cervical spine a prospective clinical series with 1-year following-up. The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2003;3(6):489-95.
9.
Daube JR. Intraoperative monitoring by evoked potentials for spinal cord surgery: the pros. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989;73(5):374-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4....
10.
Orchowski J, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG. Neurological deficit from a purely vascular etiology after unilateral vessel ligation during anterior thoracolumbar fusion of the spine. Spine, 2005;30(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs... PMid:15706337.
11.
Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA, Glassman SD, Ames CP, Berven SH, et al. Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine, 2011;36(15). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b... PMid:21217448.
12.
Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H, et al. Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scoliosis using computer-assisted surgery. Journal of Spinal Disorders Techniques, 2007;21(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b... PMid:18458587.
13.
Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine, 2007;32(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs... PMid:17224800.
14.
Han W, Gae ZL, Wang JC, et al. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine a comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques. Orthopedics, 2010;33(8). https://doi.org/10.3928/014774....
15.
Schizas C, Then E, Kwaitkowski B, et al. Pedicle screws insertion robotic assistance versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 2012;78(2):240-5.
16.
Tian W, Liu YJ, Liu B, et al. Clinical contrast of cervical pedicle screw fixation assisted by C-arm fluoroscopy or 3D navigation system. Chinese J. Surg., 2006;44(20):1399-1402.
17.
Smith HE, Welch MD, Sasso RC, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy versus computed-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J. Spinal Cord Med., 2008;31(5):532-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/107902... PMid:19086710 PMCid:PMC2607125.
18.
Hart R, Komzak M, Barta R, et al. Reduction of radiation exposure by the use of fluoroscopic guidance in transpedicular instrumentation. Acta Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2011;78(5):447-50.
19.
Biswas D, Bible JE, Whang PG, et al. Sterility of C-arm fluoroscopy during spinal surgery. Spine, 2008;33(17). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b... PMid:18622356.
20.
Lapsley HM, Vogels R. Quality and cost impacts prevention of post-operative clean wound infections. Int. J. Health Care Qual Assur inc Leadersh Helth Serv., 1998;11(6-7):222-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/095268... PMid:10339096.
21.
Esses SL, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine, 1993;18(15):2231-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/000076... PMid:8278838.
22.
Gautschi OP, Schatlo B, Schaller K, Tessitore E. Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thorac-lumbar surgery and their management a literature reviews of 35630 pedicle screws. Neurological Focus, 2011;Sep. 30-31:8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7... PMid:21961871.
23.
Wood M, Mannion R. A comparison of CT-based navigation techniques for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement. Journal of Spinal Disorders Techniques, 2011;24(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b... PMid:20625324.
24.
Van de Kelft E, Costa F, Van der Planken D, Schils F. A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar and sacral levels with the use of the O-arm imaging system and Stealth-Station navigation. Spine, 2012;37(25):1580-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b... PMid:23196967.
25.
Hodges SD, Eck JC, Newton D. Analysis of CT-based navigation system for pedicle screw placement. Orthopedics, 2012;35(8):1221-4. https://doi.org/10.3928/014774... PMid:22868609.
26.
Sembrano JN, Polly DW, Ledonio CG, Santos ER. Intraoperative 3-dimentional imaging (O-arm) for assessment of pedicle screw position. Does it unacceptable screw placement? International Journal of Spine Surgery, 2012;12(1):49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp... PMid:25694871 PMCid:PMC4300877.
27.
Schouten R, Lee R, Boyd M, et al. Intraoperative cone-beam CT (O-arm) and stereotactic navigation in acute spinal trauma surgery. Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurological Society of Australia, 2012;19(8):1137-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn... PMid:22721892.
28.
Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine, 2007;32(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs... PMid:17268254.
29.
Ledonio CG, Polly G, Vitale MG, et al. Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety a systematic literature review from the scoliosis research society of North America task force. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery, 2011;93(13):1227-34. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J... PMid:21776576.
30.
Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V. Complication of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine, 2010;35(11). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b... PMid:20473117.
31.
Pourrostami K, Heshmat R, Hemati Z, Heidari-Beni M, Qorbani M, et al. Association of fruit and vegetable intake with meal skipping in children and adolescents: the CASPIAN-V study. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 2019 May 16:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519... PMid:31098987.
32.
Jalili C, Ahmadi S, Roshankhah S, Salahshoor M. Effect of Genistein on reproductive parameter and serum nitric oxide levels in morphine-treated mice. International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2016;14(2):95-102. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijrm.... PMid:27200423 PMCid:PMC4869156.
| eISSN: | 2516-3507 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
